Using AI to make a knockoff cat art of the "To Kill a Mockingbird" I saw in a NYC shop window

by ericshefferman (1 subs) • 73 views

Ai (0 subs)

Want updates? Log in to subscribe to this author or topic and get email digests.
Viewing attachments (video, photos) costs you more per view; hide them to pay only for the text portion.
You must be logged in to see photos and attachments.

I saw this painting in a art store window in NYC.

I don't even have to ask to know I'm not going to buy it.


But the idea is so good, it must be easy to make something similar.


Using the free usage of Nano Banana Pro, I uploaded my bad cell photo and a cover of To Kill a Mockingbird


Unfortunately, while the cover used in the painting looked familiar, I couldn't find it online so I used what I found.


My first prompt

I'd like an image of an orange tabby cat reading a hardcover copy of To Kill a Mockingbird inspired by this image I took but there's an annoying window reflection in it. Just make the cat on the bed reading the book turning the page with it's paw. Make it as a horizontal poster image.


I didn't like how that came out. The cat didn't look engaged, the book wasn't right (part paperback, part hardcover), and the cat was lying down and didn't look active.


My second prompt

Have the cat sitting up in bed propped against a pillow so it is facing the viewer with the book in front of it. Like the pose in the original image.


I then cropped the generated image to a dramatic square cropping which got rid of fluffy blanket blahness.

This game me a 505x505 pixel image.

I scaled it up to a 12 inch by 12 inch 300 dpi image and then applied sharpening.

NOTE: scaling a 505x505 image to 3600x3600 is a bad plan in general, but worked out OK this time.

Even though the original was small, it was crisp.


I couldn't get an effect I liked, but I have other software somewhere that does "painter effects" to give it brushstrokes.

I think something like that will help cover up the relatively tiny source image I got from cropping the small AI image.

And help cover over some of the AI imperfections.


It's amazing how quick and easy this was to go from inspiration to art.


I write about AI and making video games and using AI to make video games on substack

https://eric81766.substack.com/


Links from the author
❤️ 2 👍 0 👎 0
Hashtags 1

No hashtags yet.

Log in to add or vote on hashtags.

Comments 6 total
adambriandada 2025-12-13 20:05:23
Hmmm my email notification that you made a new post have a link to nowhere lol. I will need to report the bug to myself.
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0
ericshefferman 2025-12-17 16:41:48
no tattling!
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0
adambriandada 2025-12-17 15:04:34
Test for revenue sharing points.
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0
adambriandada 2025-12-19 13:27:20
This post is now ranking with Google Search. If you search the entire title, it pops up as #1 (obviously) but it's good to see that some Ai tags are ranking with Google already.
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0 👑 1
ericshefferman 2025-12-19 15:31:44
Wow - yes this post is ranked #1, right below this comprehensive warning:

AI Overview
Creating an AI-generated "knockoff" of the To Kill a Mockingbird cover, particularly for commercial use, carries significant legal risks of copyright infringement. The novel and its cover art are still under copyright protection, which will last until at least 2056.
Here is a breakdown of the copyright considerations:
Copyright Protection
Original Work: Harper Lee's novel and the specific artwork used on its covers are protected by copyright, meaning the author's estate and publishers hold exclusive rights to reproduce and create derivative works.
AI and Copyright: While you can use AI as a tool, if the resulting image is "substantially similar" to the original cover art, it would likely be considered an infringing derivative work.
Lack of AI Protection: Works generated purely by AI without significant human creative input are not eligible for U.S. copyright protection. This means you would have no legal recourse if someone else copied your AI-generated cat art.
Risks of Infringement
Selling the Art: Selling "knockoff" art for profit significantly increases the risk of a lawsuit from the copyright holders, who can sue for substantial damages.
Fair Use is Unlikely: The "fair use" defense, which allows limited use for purposes like commentary or parody, is a legal gray area and often doesn't apply if the new work competes with or acts as a market substitute for the original, which a "knockoff" might do.
AI Training Data: Many AI models are trained on vast datasets of copyrighted images found online. The resulting output can sometimes closely resemble the training data, leading to potential infringement issues regardless of the user's intent.
Legal and Ethical Alternatives
Instead of directly copying the existing cover, consider creating a parody or original art inspired by the novel's themes that is visually distinct enough to avoid copyright claims.
Focus on Themes: Use AI to generate an original image of a cat with common symbols associated with the book (e.g., a tree, a small town) without mimicking the specific composition, style, or elements of the official cover art.
Significant Human Input: If you use an AI to generate elements, you must add substantial human creativity and modification (e.g., editing, compositing, original artistic elements) to the image to potentially qualify for partial copyright protection on your contributions.
Seek Public Domain Works: Use AI to create art based on books that are in the public domain (works published before 1929 in the U.S.), eliminating copyright risk.
In summary, directly attempting to create a "knockoff" of a currently copyrighted work using AI is strongly discouraged due to potential legal consequences. It is safer and more ethical to create an original piece of art that uses the novel's ideas and themes rather than its protected expression.
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0 😂 1
adambriandada 2025-12-19 15:33:34
Ha! All of these warnings about Ai will lead people to go blind to them OR rebel from them.
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0 👑 1

Log in to comment.

Similar posts

Post economics

  • Viewer would pay: $0.00005000
  • Author would earn: $0.00004000
  • Server would burn: $0.00001000

Log in to participate.

Log in to view feed