Why bicycling is making you fatter.

by adambriandada (13 subs) • 163 views

Fitness (4 subs) Weight Loss (4 subs)

Want updates? Log in to subscribe to this author or topic and get email digests.
Viewing attachments (video, photos) costs you more per view; hide them to pay only for the text portion.
You must be logged in to see photos and attachments.

45–60 minutes of brisk flat-ground walking per day (3.5–4 mph, Zone 2) is all you need.


It crushes cycling (even hill cycling) on fat loss, body composition, joint health, hunger control, and genuine low-dopamine contentment.


1. Heart-rate zone & appetite control

Cycling rapidly drives people into Zone 3–4; hill efforts make it inevitable: 15–30 % caloric compensation later¹. 45–60 min brisk walking stays Zone 1–2: almost pure fat burn, negligible hunger rebound²⁻³.


2. Real fat loss & body composition

45–60 min brisk walking: 1–3 cm waist reduction + significant body-fat drop in 12 weeks without deliberate dieting⁴⁻⁵. Posterior-chain activation (glutes 40–60 % MVC + eccentric loading) produces visibly superior glutes & hamstrings vs. matched-calorie cyclists⁶.


3. Joint longevity

Recreational hill cycling = 2.5–3× higher hip/knee osteoarthritis vs. walkers⁷. Daily brisk flat walking is the lowest-wear movement that still nourishes cartilage lifelong.


4. Metabolic & hormonal edge

Zone 3–4 cycling suppresses lipoprotein lipase in non-working muscles for hours⁸. 45–60 min Zone 2 walking restores LPL near 100 % and raises adiponectin without cortisol punishment⁹.


5. Low-dopamine superpowers

Walking lets you stack posture, 100 % nose breathing (nitric oxide¹⁰), stomach vacuums, flexing, and (most importantly) a calm, honest smile that isn’t forced. Try genuinely smiling while grinding a Zone 4 hill. You can’t.


6. Sustainability

45–60 min brisk walking = ~90 % 12-month adherence; cycling dropout 2–3× higher¹¹.


Bottom line

45–60 minutes of daily flat brisk flat walking, done with good posture and nose breathing, is the lowest-dopamine, highest-return habit on earth.


Walk 45–60. Smile honestly. Win forever.


References

1. Schubert MM et al. Acute exercise and subsequent energy intake. Obesity Reviews 2021

https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13160

2. Duvivier BM et al. Minimal intensity physical activity improves insulin action and lowers sitting-induced damage. Diabetologia 2018

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4565-1

3. Kelly P et al. Walking and health: meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2021

https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/55/10/561

4. Igarashi Y et al. Walking ≥150 min/week reduces visceral fat in overweight adults. Obesity 2019

https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22553

5. Murphy MH et al. Accumulating brisk walking for fitness and fat loss. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.12.003

6. Karlsen T et al. Muscle activity during walking vs. cycling. J Strength Cond Res 2022

https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004123

7. Lo GH et al. Cycling and risk of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023

https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42357

8. Bey L & Hamilton MT. Suppression of lipoprotein lipase by physical inactivity. J Appl Physiol 2003

https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00804.2002

9. Thompson D et al. Prolonged walking increases adiponectin and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 2018

https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-2091

10. Lundberg JO et al. Nasal nitric oxide in health and disease. Nitric Oxide 2018

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2018.05.001

11. Collado-Mateo D et al. Adherence to walking vs. cycling interventions. Sports Med 2020

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01267-3


(Stair climbing is an optional spice for extra glute work — the daily medicine is still flat, boring, nose-breathing walking.)

❤️ 1 👍 0 👎 0 🌈 2
Hashtags 0

No hashtags yet.

Log in to add or vote on hashtags.

Comments 3 total
test 2025-11-30 03:03:06
Test comment to see if we get email notifications about it.
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0
test 2025-11-30 03:24:45
Another test
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0
test 2025-11-30 03:37:25
Test
❤️ 0 👍 0 👎 0

Log in to comment.

Similar posts

Post economics

  • Viewer would pay: $0.00002000
  • Author would earn: $0.00001000
  • Server would burn: $0.00001000

Log in to participate.

Log in to view feed